ISLAMABAD, July 1(ABC): The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Friday summoned Hamza Shahbaz and Pervez Elahi, the two contenders for the Punjab chief minister’s slot, to ask them about PTI’s plea to defer the election process.
The directive came after PTI sought an extension of seven days before the process of re-election.
In another bid to remove Hamza Shahbaz from the post of Punjab chief minister, PTI approached the SC to challenge the orders of the Lahore High Court (LHC) to hold a vote recount on the CM poll held on April 16.
The SC accepted the plea for an immediate hearing earlier in the day and formed a three-member bench. The hearing is currently underway by the bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial.
In a 4-1 split decision, the LHC wrapped up PTI’s case against Hamza’s election to the CM’s slot, while ordering to recount the votes cast during the Punjab chief executive’s election but with the exclusion of 25 PTI dissidents’ votes, in line with the apex court’s interpretation of Article 63(A).
At the outset of the hearing, PTI leader Babar Awan appeared before the court while PTI’s counsel attended the hearing through video link.
Starting his arguments, Awan informed the court that all of the PTI lawmakers are not present in Lahore as some have gone to perform Hajj while some are attending family events.
At this, Justice Ijazul Ahsan remarked that he doesn’t agree on waiting before the voting if any member is absent.
Meanwhile, the CJP said the PTI’s plea seeks time for the lawmakers who are not in the capital as they are away for several reasons — marriages and performing religious obligations.
“So why should the Supreme Court intervene in this? Does the PTI want the court to give it more time? Should we intervene in LHC’s decision?” the CJP questioned.
The chief justice said that the LHC order mentions that the date for voting will be today. “Are you ready for it?” he asked, at which PTI sought seven days for re-polling.
The CJP responded to the request by saying that the lawmakers present in the country should have been able to reach the capital within a day.
“How much time is required for your lawmakers to reach Lahore? Do you want Punjab to remain without a chief minister for seven days?” the chief justice wondered.
CJP Bandial asked if the CM is not in office, who runs the province.
Moving on, Justice Ahsan said a question remains on whether the session for re-voting of the CM will be held at 4pm today or not.
“Persuade us that the session should not be held today, then we will decide whether it should be called today or not,” he told the PTI lawyers.
He also wondered that whether there is a section in the constitution that allows the imposition of governor rule till the election of the CM.
PTI counsel Faisal Chaudhry maintained that PTI has 169 members if the 25 dissidents are excluded.
“This means you don’t have the majority,” CJP Bandial remarked.
At this, Chaudhry said that no one in the Punjab Assembly has the majority.
Meanwhile, Siddiqui maintained that the governor runs the provincial affairs till the election of the CM.
CJ Bandial snapped saying that a by-election on 20 seats is slated for July 17.
“How can we stop the province from working till the by-election,” he remarked, adding that handing the reins to the governor would be unconstitutional.
“We understand PTI’s concern but I don’t think the province should be left without a CM,” the CJ remarked.
The plea seeks an immediate hearing on the plea, requesting to remove Hamza Shahbaz from Punjab CM’s post and suspend the process of recounting till a decision on this plea.
PTI has maintained in its plea that LHC’s order should be amended and sufficient time be granted to notify all the lawmakers to ensure their presence in the Punjab Assembly session, so that a free and fair election of the Punjab CM can be held.
Referring to the objection raised by LHC’s Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, PTI sought to quash the notification issued for appointment of Hamza Shahbaz as the CM as he’ll no longer have the majority of votes within the contemplation of Article 130(4) of the Constitution when the PTI dissidents’ votes are excluded.
In his dissenting note in the verdict, Justice Sethi had said that the votes of the 25 PTI dissidents cast in favour of Hamza were “admitted”, therefore, there was no need to repeat the exercise of counting/recounting.
The judge noted that in the 371-strong Punjab Assembly, the requisite number needed to become chief minister was 186 votes. He went on to say that from the record, Hamza obtained 197 votes. Justice Sethi also said that after excluding the 25 votes, Hamza had 172 votes. “Therefore, he is not member elected within the contemplation of Article 130(4) of the Constitution and being a stranger to the office of chief minister, cannot be allowed to hold the office,” he said.
“[…] the Chief Minister Punjab may kindly be removed pending this election process due to absence of a valid notification of his appointment and that the Court may graciously grant such time and issue such direction where free and fair election to the post of Chief Minister Punjab takes place with the participation of duly constituted Assembly in accordance with the norms of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973,” the plea stated.
Sibtain Khan, Leader of Opposition in Punjab Assembly, Zainab Umair, Mian Muhammad Aslam Iqbal, Syed Abbas Ali Shah and Ahsan Saleem Bharyar have filed the petition.
CM Hamza Shahbaz, Punjab government, Deputy Speaker Punjab Assembly Dost Mohammad Mazari, Governor Punjab’s secretary and PA secretary were named as respondents in the case.
